BCD SPECIAL REPORT ON
HERITAGE RETROFIT
FIRST ANNUAL EDITION
11
has run a local energy-efficiency advice
service in the Bristol and Somerset area for
more than 20 years, including home visits
for complex cases. It is regularly called
upon to advise householders in traditional
homes on how to improve efficiency
(mainly by reducing heat loss). Three
things are becoming increasingly clear to
CSE advisers as they deliver these services:
• Residents of traditional homes
often have little knowledge of the
construction techniques used in
them, or the way in which moisture
moves through the building. This is
compounded by a tendency to believe
(perhaps because of the marketing
techniques of modern housebuilders)
that moisture movement in or through
walls should be resisted at all costs,
and that it is a sign of an underlying
problem with the house.
• Very few people understand the
meaning of the term ‘significance’
when applied to historic properties.
Householders typically fail to
distinguish between impacts on
historic significance and impacts on
the physical fabric of the building
when proposing change. They are
not the same; one can be present
without the other – for example poorly
fitted insulation which increases
condensation could lead to physical
damage in the first instance by creating
a build-up of damp between a stone
wall and internal wood panelling. If
the wood panelling then has to be
removed as a result, then not only is
there physical damage but ultimately
loss of historic significance as well.
However, it is also possible to damage
only the historic significance of a
building, for example by obscuring
decorative brickwork with external
wall insulation where this measure has
no detrimental effect on the physical
fabric of the building. Conservation
officers may well object to proposed
retrofit simply because it will damage
historic significance, a concept that
the householder often finds vague and
elusive, without causing actual physical
harm to the building.
• It is very common for householders
to want to make changes based on
a desire for a particular product or
measure (such as double glazing),
rather than a desire to see a particular
outcome (such as reducing draughts),
often because they have received some
sort of marketing literature about the
product in question.
Particularly where buildings are listed
or in a conservation area, these three
factors are the source of a great deal of
conflict with local authority conservation
and planning teams who expect greater
justification for the installation of
potentially damaging measures than
many householders are prepared to give.
More guidance is also becoming available
to support local authorities in framing
their decisions. The forthcoming Historic
England conservation research report The
Sustainable Use of Energy in Traditional
Dwellings (authored by CSE, expected
Spring 2017) is targeted at local authority
planning and conservation officers and
explores how to use legislation and policy
to guide decision-making.
Where the building is neither listed
nor in a conservation area, there is no
such oversight from local authority
experts, and these three factors (alone
or in combination) mean that many
householders are making changes to their
properties that can be hugely damaging to
their value, both from a heritage point of
view and also in physical terms.
To try to cut through some of this
potential for conflict, the Centre for
Sustainable Energy produced a booklet
titled
Love Your Old Home
in 2014. The
booklet guides homeowners through a
four-step process to evaluate what makes
their home historically significant, and
what that means for the types of energy
efficiency improvements they could make.
CSE is also working with the National
Trust on guidance for applying for and
securing consent for traditional home
retrofit, which is primarily aimed at
helping residents in protected buildings to
understand how to apply for consent for
appropriate measures, but will also be a
useful resource for local authority officers.
An accompanying online resource is also
being developed to provide technical
advice on a range of retrofit measures
THE ENERGY HIERARCHY
The energy hierarchy is an excellent
framework for thinking through the range
of possible changes:
• first reduce energy demand (for example
by changing behaviour in the home)
• then ensure energy is used as
efficiently as possible
The Centre for Sustainable Energy’s
Love Your Old
Home
booklet (2014)
Damp and mould caused by poor external wall
insulation (Photo: Centre for Sustainable Energy)
LEAST INVASIVE
INVASIVE
MOST INVASIVE
WALLS
Gap filling
Internal solid wall
insulation
External solid wall
insulation
Insulating within depth of
timber frame
ROOFS
Loft hatch insulation
Rafter insulation
(heated loft)
Loft insulation
(unheated loft)
Flat roof insulation
FLOORS
Gap filling and floor
coverings
Under-floor insulation
(suspended floor)
Under-floor insulation
(solid floor)
Under-floor heating
Over-floor insulation
WINDOWS
Thermal curtains and blinds
Refurbishing or reinstating
shutters
Refurbishing and
draught-proofing
original windows
Replacing non-original or
badly damaged original
windows with timber
double glazing or slim-line
timber double glazing
Film secondary glazing
Framed secondary glazing
DOORS
Door draught-proofing
New high-performance
thermal doors
Door refurbishment
Creating a draught lobby
CHIMNEYS
Chimney blocking