BCD SPECIAL REPORT ON
HERITAGE RETROFIT
FIRST ANNUAL EDITION
29
configuration of the building in question –
not all older buildings can accommodate
the ducting or fan units required for some
ventilation systems. Other factors such
as complexity and occupant type must
also be considered, as they can be key
determinants of success.
TABLE 2 A simple overview of each of the principal
ventilation options, and their main pros and cons
INTERMITTENT EXTRACT (suitable band B–E)
Pros
• low cost
• easy to install
• easy to use
Cons
• fan noise
• user can choose not
to use
PASSIVE STACK VENTILATION (suitable band B–C)
Pros
• low cost
• easy to install
(in top-floor wet rooms)
• silent
• continuous
Cons
• hard to accommodate
vertical ducting (in
ground-floor wet rooms)
• summer ventilation may
be insufficient
CENTRALISED MECHANICAL EXTRACT (suitable band A–C)
Pros
• medium cost
• potentially easy to
install
• easy to use
• continuous
• maintains background
ventilation
Cons
• requires ducting,
which may be hard to
accommodate
• uses electricity
• potential fan noise
DECENTRALISED MECHANICAL EXTRACT (suitable band A–C)
Pros
• low cost
• easy to install
• easy to use
• continuous
• maintains background
ventilation
• less ducting than
centralised system
Cons
• uses electricity
• room-side fan: increased
potential for fan noise
WHOLE-HOUSE MECHANICAL HEAT RECOVERY (suitable band A–B)
Pros
• air quality: intake air
is filtered
• comfort: air movement
and exchange
throughout home
• efficiency: heat
recovery reduces heat
demand and tempers
incoming air
Cons
• most expensive system
• requires ducting to most
rooms
• uses electricity
• potential fan noise
• correct commissioning
can be complex
The suitable band information refers to Table 1 (Source:
A Bristolian’s Guide to Solid Wall Insulation
).
membranes) the greater the potential
for application errors or future failure,
in contrast to a simpler system (a wet
lime plaster finish and/or backing coat
for a wood-fibre insulation system, for
example) which could be more robust
in the longer term.
• End-use and end-users
– how is
the building going to be used post-
retrofit and who will be using it?
How engaged are they? What, if any,
behavioural changes may be needed?
Are they tech-savvy or would a
simple, passive ventilation system suit
them better? All these questions need
to be answered to inform the design of
a suitable ventilation strategy.
Considering all these aspects before
embarking on building work is more likely
to result in a successful retrofit.
VENTILATION OPTIONS
Once a thorough assessment of insulation,
airtightness and ventilation has been
made, an appropriate ventilation system
needs to be identified. There are many
different types of ventilation system, all
with different pros and cons (see Table 2).
Broadly these divide into passive and
mechanical systems. Passive ventilation
systems work on the basis that warm air
rises and avoids the need for extractor
fans. Ducts rise through the building
to the roof, extracting moist air from
bathrooms and kitchens. The extracted
air is replaced by air drawn in from
outside through adjacent rooms, so the
whole house is naturally ventilated. These
systems rely on changing air pressures
and particularly on wind movement over
roof vents, so the design of the system
must be carefully considered and they are
not always suitable or feasible.
The simplest mechanical ventilation
systems use the same system of air
displacement but use fans to extract moist
air from those rooms with the highest
moisture level. These may be intermittent
(a simple extractor fan in a bathroom
for example, activated by a humidistat)
or constantly operating at a low speed
(a ‘decentralised mechanical extract
ventilation system’ or DMEV). More
complex systems have centralised fans
and can be either continuous or demand
controlled. In theory this makes the
systems more reliable and the fans can be
less noisy as they are located in loft spaces
or cupboards.
Mechanical ventilation and heat-
recovery (MVHR) systems are the most
complex mechanical systems, having a
heat exchanger and two sets of ducts, one
to extract moist air and the other to supply
fresh air back to the adjacent rooms,
preheated using the heat from the waste
air. MVHR systems are generally best
suited to comprehensive retrofits where a
high level of airtightness is achieved.
The type of system suitable for
a building depends largely on its
post-retrofit airtightness and on the